Head to head
Aiseo Audit vs HIG Doctor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Audit web pages for AI search readiness with evidence-tiered factors and pipeline-stage scores.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Apple Human Interface Guidelines search, lookup, and project audits for AI coding agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Aiseo Audit (94/100 against 83). HIG Doctor has noticeably more public adoption.
| Aiseo Audit | HIG Doctor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 8 | 129 |
| Downloads / week | 22 | 106 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |