Head to head
MCP vs HasData Google Hotels
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search current Japanese point-site rewards, conditions, yen values, and observation times.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Google Hotels search: rates, ratings, amenities and what each booking site charges, as JSON.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HasData Google Hotels (100/100 against 67). HasData Google Hotels has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | HasData Google Hotels | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 113 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 1 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |