Head to head
gigamail vs ai-context
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Your real mailbox and calendar for your agent (M365/IMAP); a human approves every send.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP server: version-correct library docs, code map, and offline drift for your repo.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (71 and 71 out of 100). ai-context has noticeably more public adoption.
| gigamail | ai-context | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B71/100 | B71/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | 2.2k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |