Head to head
Pylos vs MCP Emails
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pylos
Bio.github.adamVass/pylos-mcpNo reviews yet
Read-focused, prompt-injection-hardened email MCP server for any IMAP provider
Full listing
No reviews yet
Never-stored live email: read, send, organize, schedule and auto-triage Gmail or any IMAP mailbox.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Emails (96/100 against 83). MCP Emails is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pylos runs on your own machine. MCP Emails has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pylos | MCP Emails | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A96/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | 37 | 31 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 11 | — |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category |