Head to head
mcptoon vs Edgehound
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Zero-dependency MCP client: one synced config for every agent, 581-token listings, not 71,929.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Writes adversarial test suites for AI-built code. Your agent's test engineer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Edgehound (97/100 against 89). Edgehound is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcptoon runs on your own machine. mcptoon has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcptoon | Edgehound | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 202 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.2k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |