Head to head
safari-mcp vs ReplyNodes
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Native Safari browser automation for AI agents — 98 tools, zero Chrome overhead.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web MCP: scrape/crawl sites, web search, brand assets, app stores, YouTube, Reddit, Hacker News.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ReplyNodes (89/100 against 69). ReplyNodes is hosted and callable through the gateway; safari-mcp runs on your own machine. safari-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| safari-mcp | ReplyNodes | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 203 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 3.3k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 51 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |