Head to head
Safari vs Proving Lab
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Native Safari browser automation for AI agents — 98 tools, zero Chrome overhead.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Cite or capture a web page; installs the capture extension in Firefox and Chrome.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (69 and 69 out of 100). Proving Lab is hosted and callable through the gateway; Safari runs on your own machine. Safari has noticeably more public adoption.
| Safari | Proving Lab | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 204 | – |
| Downloads / week | 2.6k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 10 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |