Head to head
Safari vs Swamix MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Native Safari browser automation for AI agents — 98 tools, zero Chrome overhead.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hosted MCP catalog with 30 tenant-isolated browser, RAG, AI, mail and media tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Safari (69/100 against 60). Swamix MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Safari runs on your own machine. Safari has noticeably more public adoption.
| Safari | Swamix MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 204 | – |
| Downloads / week | 2.6k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 98 | — |
| Write actions | 11 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |