Head to head
Fish vs Voice Audio
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server exposing the AceDataCloud Fish Audio API (text-to-speech with voice conditioning)
Full listingVoice Audio
Cio.github.CSOAI-ORG/voice-audio-mcpNo reviews yet
Voice Audio MCP server. Tools: text to speech, list voices, transcribe. Built by MEOK AI Labs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fish (99/100 against 65). Fish is hosted and callable through the gateway; Voice Audio runs on your own machine. Fish has noticeably more public adoption.
| Fish | Voice Audio | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-06 | — |
| Category | Media | Media |