Head to head
CTlogs.io vs Google Ads MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Certificate Transparency search: subdomains, certificate history and hostname keyword search.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Google Ads MCP: GAQL queries, resources, recommendations, keyword ideas, change history. 11 tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CTlogs.io (97/100 against 80). CTlogs.io is hosted and callable through the gateway; Google Ads MCP runs on your own machine.
| CTlogs.io | Google Ads MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 42 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 11 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-05 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |