Head to head
phi-guard-mcp vs firmware-test-farm-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listingfirmware-test-farm-mcp
Bio.github.oxyvore-cyber/firmware-test-farm-mcpNo reviews yet
Flash and run real firmware on physical embedded dev boards from an AI agent, over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours phi-guard-mcp (92/100 against 83). firmware-test-farm-mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; phi-guard-mcp runs on your own machine.
| phi-guard-mcp | firmware-test-farm-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 80 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |