Head to head
grim-mcp vs HTMLvault
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security audit for AI agents: code, deps, exposure, secrets, drift, SBOM, and IoC.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Publish and manage secure HTML links: PII/secret scanning, batch create, patch edits, analytics.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HTMLvault (70/100 against 62). HTMLvault is hosted and callable through the gateway; grim-mcp runs on your own machine. grim-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| grim-mcp | HTMLvault | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 822 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |