Head to head
Tapp vs Reelier
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Tapp
Aio.github.aarwitz/tappNo reviews yet
Test iOS, Android, and web apps with agent exploration, replayable flows, and CI gates.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Snapshot tests and CI for agent workflows: record a run, replay it at 0 tokens, diff for drift.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 86 out of 100).
| Tapp | Reelier | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 897 | 85 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-08-25 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |