Head to head
Tapp vs gha-doctor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Tapp
Aio.github.aarwitz/tappNo reviews yet
Test iOS, Android, and web apps with agent exploration, replayable flows, and CI gates.
Full listinggha-doctor
Cio.github.linnea-bakshi/gha-doctorNo reviews yet
Diagnose GitHub Actions CI: lint, flaky tests, wasted minutes, health score. Read-only MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tapp (85/100 against 68).
| Tapp | gha-doctor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 897 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 33 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |