Head to head
AANet vs Claudinho
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Locks, budgeted sub-keys, storage, messaging, webhooks for agent swarms, billed via x402.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live 2026 World Cup scores, fixtures & standings for your AI agent. No keys. Unofficial fan project.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Claudinho (92/100 against 60). AANet is hosted and callable through the gateway; Claudinho runs on your own machine. Claudinho has noticeably more public adoption.
| AANet | Claudinho | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 29 |
| Downloads / week | – | 433 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 26 | 9 |
| Write actions | 11 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |