Head to head
Dekko vs BagIQ MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static code map generator: MAP.md + map.json for any repo, plus a Claude Code /map plugin
Full listing
No reviews yet
Analyse disc golf bag gaps and overlap, recommend discs, and open an interactive Bag Map.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Dekko (85/100 against 67). BagIQ MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Dekko runs on your own machine. Dekko has noticeably more public adoption.
| Dekko | BagIQ MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 5 | – |
| Downloads / week | 69 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |