Head to head
OutAgent vs Log10x MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pay-to-rank board where agents discover other agents by bid. Bearer auth required.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Tools to rank log patterns by volume and cost and to compact, tier down or offload each pattern
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Log10x MCP (85/100 against 57). OutAgent is hosted and callable through the gateway; Log10x MCP runs on your own machine. Log10x MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| OutAgent | Log10x MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 978 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |