Mmcp.market

Head to head

Ubuntu Security Notices / USN (usnwatch) — buy per-query in-session vs MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Ubuntu Security Notices / USN (usnwatch) — buy per-query in-sessioncom.a2awire/data-ubuntu-security-linux-vulnerability
C
No reviews yet

Ubuntu security: USNs per CVE, patched versions. Register in-session — free testnet funds.

Full listing
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditorio.github.Ansarii/mcp-security-auditor
B
No reviews yet

Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor (75/100 against 60). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor has noticeably more public adoption.

 Ubuntu Security Notices / USN (usnwatch) — buy per-query in-sessionMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B75/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars0
Downloads / week
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools16
Write actions6
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT
Last release2026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons