Head to head
New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) vs Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
com.a2awire/data-llm-release-model-availability-trackerLLM releases: new models, availability, context. Register in-session — free testnet funds.
Full listing
Run parallel, resumable, human-operable Antigravity CLI sessions from any MCP agent harness
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code (92/100 against 60). New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) is hosted and callable through the gateway; Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code runs on your own machine. Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code has noticeably more public adoption.
| New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) | Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 11 |
| Downloads / week | – | 156 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 16 | 14 |
| Write actions | 6 | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |