Mmcp.market

Head to head

New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) vs Create Starter

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch)com.a2awire/data-llm-release-model-availability-tracker
C
No reviews yet

LLM releases: new models, availability, context. Register in-session — free testnet funds.

Full listing
Create Starterio.github.starter-series/create-starter
A
No reviews yet

Scaffold Starter Series projects and check release, deployment, security, and agent instructions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Create Starter (91/100 against 60). New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) is hosted and callable through the gateway; Create Starter runs on your own machine. Create Starter has noticeably more public adoption.

 New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch)Create Starter
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100A91/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–2
Downloads / week–75
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools169
Write actions63
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-16
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) vs AuscaNew LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) vs Watch SkillNew LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) vs SanityNew LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) vs MaginaryNew LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) vs BridgeNode MCPAll AI and agents servers