Head to head
Go Vulnerability Database Tracker — buy per-query in-session (govulnwatch) vs Neon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Go Vulnerability Database Tracker — buy per-query in-session (govulnwatch)
Ccom.a2awire/data-go-vulnerability-golang-securityNo reviews yet
Go vulns: CVEs per module, fixed versions. $0.01/query. Register in-session — free testnet funds.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Neon (97/100 against 60). Neon has noticeably more public adoption.
| Go Vulnerability Database Tracker — buy per-query in-session (govulnwatch) | Neon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 648 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 16 | — |
| Write actions | 6 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |
Other comparisons
Go Vulnerability Database Tracker — buy per-query in-session (govulnwatch) vs DBHubGo Vulnerability Database Tracker — buy per-query in-session (govulnwatch) vs MCP Toolbox for DatabasesGo Vulnerability Database Tracker — buy per-query in-session (govulnwatch) vs LINQ to DBGo Vulnerability Database Tracker — buy per-query in-session (govulnwatch) vs Magic CloudGo Vulnerability Database Tracker — buy per-query in-session (govulnwatch) vs InfrawiseAll Databases servers