Mmcp.market

Head to head

Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lint

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query)com.a2awire/data-dependency-vulnerability-malicious-package-security
C
No reviews yet

Dependency vulns & malicious-package advisories. Register in-session — free testnet funds.

Full listing
Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lintio.github.jmshinhwa/fedramp-oscal-ssp-lint
A
No reviews yet

16 checks on a system-security-plan JSON, in your editor, before a validator returns the package

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lint (89/100 against 60). Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lint runs on your own machine.

 Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query)Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lint
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100A89/100
AdoptionNewNew
GitHub stars–0
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools16—
Write actions6—
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—NOASSERTION
Last release—2026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs npm Registry MCP ServerDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs UpgradeLensDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs Security Txt Cra LintDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs SwampDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs Sec NportAll Security servers