Head to head
Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query)
Ccom.a2awire/data-dependency-vulnerability-malicious-package-securityNo reviews yet
Dependency vulns & malicious-package advisories. Register in-session — free testnet funds.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor (75/100 against 60). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor has noticeably more public adoption.
| Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) | MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 16 | — |
| Write actions | 6 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs npm Registry MCP ServerDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs UpgradeLensDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs Security Txt Cra LintDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs SwampDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs Sec NportAll Security servers