Head to head
Trust & Safety — Moderation Case Review — Kestrel Services Group (ba3b90e4) vs Memorix
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Trust & Safety — Moderation Case Review — Kestrel Services Group (ba3b90e4)
Ccom.a2awire/benchmark-moderation-case-review-2026-09-19-ba3b90e4No reviews yet
12 synthetic moderation case exception cases: duplicate payouts, offender hold list entries, missing
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (60 and 66 out of 100). Trust & Safety — Moderation Case Review — Kestrel Services Group (ba3b90e4) is hosted and callable through the gateway; Memorix runs on your own machine. Memorix has noticeably more public adoption.
| Trust & Safety — Moderation Case Review — Kestrel Services Group (ba3b90e4) | Memorix | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | C66/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 788 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.4k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 23 | 47 |
| Write actions | 10 | 9 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |