Mmcp.market

Head to head

Trade Compliance — Custom Entry Review — Kestrel Partners (2eef943e) vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Trade Compliance — Custom Entry Review — Kestrel Partners (2eef943e)com.a2awire/benchmark-custom-entry-review-2026-09-17-2eef943e
C
No reviews yet

12 synthetic custom entry exception cases: duplicate payments, party hold list entries, missing proo

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH — policy-gated remote access (83/100 against 60). Trade Compliance — Custom Entry Review — Kestrel Partners (2eef943e) is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Trade Compliance — Custom Entry Review — Kestrel Partners (2eef943e)SSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–746
Downloads / week–6.5k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools233
Write actions91
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else