Head to head
Zotero MCP vs searchts
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search, read, annotate, and add to your Zotero research library, local or web.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Keyless web access for AI agents: read bot-walled pages as Markdown, search, grab assets
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours searchts (92/100 against 83). Zotero MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Zotero MCP | searchts | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5.1k | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 55 | 5 |
| Write actions | 12 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |