Head to head
Leantime MCP (Unofficial) vs Patchloom
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Unofficial MCP server for Leantime: 42 agent-first tools, backup/restore, dry-run validation
Full listing
No reviews yet
Agent-safe structured edits: JSON/YAML/TOML/md/AST, dry-run, batch/tx. Not a filesystem MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Leantime MCP (Unofficial) (88/100 against 75). Patchloom has noticeably more public adoption.
| Leantime MCP (Unofficial) | Patchloom | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 17 |
| Downloads / week | – | 470 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |