Head to head
4da vs Merlonix Monitoring
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Dependency intelligence for AI agents. CVE scanning, health checks, upgrade planning.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Monitoring for agencies — uptime, SSL, DNS, blocklists, AI visibility, MCP health. 8 no-auth tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours 4da (91/100 against 56). Merlonix Monitoring is hosted and callable through the gateway; 4da runs on your own machine. 4da has noticeably more public adoption.
| 4da | Merlonix Monitoring | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C56/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | – |
| Downloads / week | 112 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 14 | 16 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |