Head to head
Sentinel vs Signalfuse
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Sentinel
Corg.448c/sentinelNo reviews yet
Pay-per-call safety checks for AI agents: screen a crypto address or URL before you transact.
Full listing
No reviews yet
11 tools: crypto signals, sentiment, macro regime, arena, search, exec. x402 pay-per-call.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Signalfuse (80/100 against 67). Sentinel is hosted and callable through the gateway; Signalfuse runs on your own machine. Signalfuse has noticeably more public adoption.
| Sentinel | Signalfuse | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 42 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | 11 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-08-26 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |