Head to head
Python Code Reviewer vs mcp-audit
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Python Code Reviewer
Corg.duckdns.43-134-36-21/python-code-reviewerNo reviews yet
Security + bug + perf + refactor audit for Python. Returns 0-10 score + MD report.
Full listingmcp-audit
Aio.github.saagpatel/mcp-auditNo reviews yet
Scan, enumerate, and risk-score every MCP server configured on your machine.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-audit (89/100 against 67). Python Code Reviewer is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-audit runs on your own machine. mcp-audit has noticeably more public adoption.
| Python Code Reviewer | mcp-audit | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | 41 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | 13 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |