Head to head
Cybersec Toolkit vs grim-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Authorization-gated MCP server to discover and run 670+ security tools for CTF, pentest, and DFIR.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security audit for AI agents: code, deps, exposure, secrets, drift, SBOM, and IoC.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cybersec Toolkit (88/100 against 62).
| Cybersec Toolkit | grim-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C62/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 57 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 822 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |