Head to head
Rubric vs CHAP Coordinator
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Rubric
Cio.github.0xsims/rubric-mcp-serverNo reviews yet
Attest agent decisions and verify records on a public ledger. Evidence, not just data.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Auditable records of human decisions over AI agent work. Approvals, edits, overrides, escalations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CHAP Coordinator (94/100 against 65). CHAP Coordinator has noticeably more public adoption.
| Rubric | CHAP Coordinator | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 102 |
| Downloads / week | – | 127 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 14 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |