Head to head
Klarion vs Husk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Secret scanning for AI agents: rules and entropy find candidates, a model decides which are real.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first defensive scanner for vulnerable dependencies, leaked secrets, and risky agent configs
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Husk (91/100 against 73).
| Klarion | Husk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | – | 72 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |